linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: Move Linux RNG connection to hwrng

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANc+2y6euhcMv7FV=1_6NzqQUxDX5f_U4ZOF7EZVGS_j5=B6-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:55:33 +0530
From:   PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Move Linux RNG connection to hwrng

Hi Jason,

On 25 October 2017 at 20:48, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:15:09PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
> wrote:
>
>> > +static int tpm_add_hwrng(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> > +{
>> > +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM))
>> > +               return 0;
>>
>> Can #ifndef CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM be used instead? That way an if
>> condition can be avoided.
>
> Generally speaking IS_ENABLED is prefered over #ifdef as it reduces the
> set of compilation combinations.

Oh okay. No issues then.

Regards,
PrasannaKumar