[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-JFjjA=2T7HermH2GygfHinyW+ZC5v+Di7M4V_Fg5paHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:24:02 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Wei Wei <dotweiba@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: v4.14-rc3/arm64 DABT exception in atomic_inc() / __skb_clone()
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Wei Wei <dotweiba@...il.com> wrote:
> I have uploaded the VM core dump [1]. And I don’t know if these logs are helpful in the case of
> failing to get the C reproducer currently.
>
> [1] https://github.com/dotweiba/skb_clone_atomic_inc_bug/blob/master/vmcore.gz
Thanks. So this would be the atomic_inc on shb_shinfo(skb)->dataref, which
matches the __ll_sc_atomic_add in Mark's trace.
Debugging with crash shows 0xffff800071bb3180 and 0xffff800071bb2c80
to be valid skbuffs of len 40, no sk, both pointing to the same head.
That is indeed unaligned: head = 0xffff8000327c80c9 "", end = 256, giving
skb_shared_info at 0xffff8000327c81c9 and &skb_shared_info(skb)->dataref
at 0xffff8000327c81c9 + 36 == 0xffff8000327c81ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists