[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508976036.13477.3.camel@aj.id.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:30:36 +1030
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Michael Welling <mwelling@...cinc.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] gpio: gpiolib: Add core support for maintaining
GPIO values on reset
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:11 +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:02:27PM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> > > > > GPIO state reset tolerance is implemented in gpiolib through the
> > > > > addition of a new pinconf parameter. With that, some renaming of helpers
> > > > > is done to clarify the scope of the already existing
> > > > > gpiochip_line_is_persistent(), as it's now ambiguous as to whether that
> > > > > means on suspend, reset or both.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't it most reasonable to say persistance covers both cases, reset
> > > > and/or sleep? This seems a bit like overdefined.
>
> Seems reasonable to me to just expand the existing stuff to cover
> reset as well, I don't think that should cause any issues for the
> Arizona stuff.
Great. I addressed this in the non-RFC series.
Thanks for the feedback.
Andrew
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists