linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42211eed-3996-b968-330c-36c6ca160e0b@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:18:20 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

Ping!

On 23/10/17 09:47, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On 16/10/17 19:09, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> On 13/10/17 16:49, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
>>> integration. I've dropped the banked infrastructure for now as per the
>>> discussion with Grygorii.
>>>
>>> The first couple of patches are mostly preparatory work in order to
>>> consolidate all IRQ chip related fields in a new structure and create
>>> the base functionality for adding IRQ chips.
>>>
>>> After that, I've added the Tegra186 GPIO support patch that makes use of
>>> the new tight integration.
>>
>> I have reviewed this series and tested on Tegra, so for the series ...
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>>
>> We would really like to get support for Tegra186 GPIO in v4.15, so
>> please let us know if you think that this is do-able.
> 
> Any feedback/comments?
> 
> Thanks
> Jon
> 

-- 
nvpublic