| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:02:57 +0200
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to keep backward compatibility of flexible
inline xattr feature
Hi Chao,
On 10/26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> >
> > On 2017/10/26 16:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Chao,
> > >
> > > It seems this is a critical problem, so let me integrate this patch with your
> > > initial patch "f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size".
> > > Let me know, if you have any other concern.
> >
> > Better. ;)
> >
> > Please add commit message of this patch into initial patch "f2fs: support
> > flexible inline xattr size".
BTW, I read the patch again, and couldn't catch the problem actually.
We didn't assign inline_xattr all the time, instead do if inline_xattr
is set. Have you done some tests with this? I'm failing tests with these
changes.
> >
> > And please fix related issue in f2fs-tools with below diff code:
>
> Okay, merged.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > ---
> > include/f2fs_fs.h | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/f2fs_fs.h b/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > index 2db7495804fd..a0e15ba85d97 100644
> > --- a/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > +++ b/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > @@ -1047,11 +1047,14 @@ static inline int __get_extra_isize(struct f2fs_inode *inode)
> > extern struct f2fs_configuration c;
> > static inline int get_inline_xattr_addrs(struct f2fs_inode *inode)
> > {
> > - if (!(inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR))
> > + if ((c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_EXTRA_ATTR)) &&
> > + (c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR)))
> > + return le16_to_cpu(inode->i_inline_xattr_size);
> > + else if (!(inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR) &&
> > + (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> > return 0;
> > - if (!(c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR)))
> > + else
> > return DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > - return le16_to_cpu(inode->i_inline_xattr_size);
> > }
> >
> > #define get_extra_isize(node) __get_extra_isize(&node->i)
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > On 10/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> > >> Previously, in inode layout, we will always reserve 200 bytes for inline
> > >> xattr space no matter the inode enables inline xattr feature or not, due
> > >> to this reason, max inline size of inode is fixed, but now, if inline
> > >> xattr is not enabled, max inline size of inode will be enlarged by 200
> > >> bytes, for regular and symlink inode, it will be safe to reuse resevered
> > >> space as they are all zero, but for directory, we need to keep the
> > >> reservation for stablizing directory structure.
> > >>
> > >> Reported-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@...wei.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 5 +----
> > >> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > >> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 2 ++
> > >> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> index 2af1d31ae74b..7ddd0d085e3b 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> @@ -2393,10 +2393,7 @@ static inline int get_extra_isize(struct inode *inode)
> > >> static inline int f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(struct super_block *sb);
> > >> static inline int get_inline_xattr_addrs(struct inode *inode)
> > >> {
> > >> - if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >> - return 0;
> > >> - if (!f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(F2FS_I_SB(inode)->sb))
> > >> - return DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > >> +
> > >> return F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> index bb876737e653..7f31b22c9efa 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> @@ -232,10 +232,19 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > >> fi->i_extra_isize = f2fs_has_extra_attr(inode) ?
> > >> le16_to_cpu(ri->i_extra_isize) : 0;
> > >>
> > >> - if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >> - fi->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >> - else if (f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb))
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * Previously, we will always reserve DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS size
> > >> + * space for inline xattr datas, if inline xattr is not enabled, we
> > >> + * can expect all zero in reserved area, so for regular or symlink,
> > >> + * it will be safe to reuse reserved area, but for directory, we
> > >> + * should keep the reservation for stablizing directory structure.
> > >> + */
> > >> + if (f2fs_has_extra_attr(inode) &&
> > >> + f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb))
> > >> fi->i_inline_xattr_size = le16_to_cpu(ri->i_inline_xattr_size);
> > >> + else if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode) &&
> > >> + (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> > >> + fi->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >> else
> > >> fi->i_inline_xattr_size = DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> index e6f86d5d97b9..a1c56a14c191 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, umode_t mode)
> > >> f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb) &&
> > >> f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >> F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size = sbi->inline_xattr_size;
> > >> + else
> > >> + F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >>
> > >> if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA) && f2fs_may_inline_data(inode))
> > >> set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_DATA);
> > >> --
> > >> 2.13.1.388.g69e6b9b4f4a9
> > >
> > > .
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists