linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390/mm: return -ENOMEM in arch_get_unmapped_area[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171026121602.295e7a6e@mschwideX1>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:16:02 +0200
From:   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:     Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
        paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, mhocko@...e.com,
        Shu Wang <shuwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/mm: return -ENOMEM in
 arch_get_unmapped_area[_topdown]

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:47:39 +0800
Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:36:10 +0800
> > Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >  
> > The code in mmap.c checks for the per-task limit, 31-bit vs 64-bit.
> > pgalloc.c checks for the maximum allowed address and does not care
> > about the task.
> >  
> >> Fixes: 8ab867cb0806 (s390/mm: fix BUG_ON in crst_table_upgrade)
> >> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com>  
> >
> > I don't think this patch fixes anything.  
> 
> At least there is a logic error i think, after apply the patch
> "s390/mm: fix BUG_ON in crst_table_upgrade",
> it makes no sense to compare "if (end >= TASK_SIZE_MAX) return
> -ENOMEM" in crst_table_upgrade() function.
> 
> isn't it?

Be careful with TASK_SIZE vs. TASK_SIZE_MAX. They return different
values for 31-bit compat tasks.

If the addr parameter is correctly aligned then the if condition in
crst_table_upgrade is superfluous as TASK_SIZE_MAX is now -PAGE_SIZE
with the introduction of 5 level page tables. It is important for older
kernels with only 4 level page tables with a TASK_SIZE_MAX of 2**53.

On the other hand if addr is ever a value between -PAGE_SIZE and -1
we would end up with an endless loop. That makes the if condition a
safe-guard and I would like to keep it.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.