[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:26:37 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: [PATCH] VFS: use synchronize_rcu_expedited() in namespace_unlock()
The synchronize_rcu() in namespace_unlock() is called every time
a filesystem is unmounted. If a great many filesystems are mounted,
this can cause a noticable slow-down in, for example, system shutdown.
The sequence:
mkdir -p /tmp/Mtest/{0..5000}
time for i in /tmp/Mtest/*; do mount -t tmpfs tmpfs $i ; done
time umount /tmp/Mtest/*
on a 4-cpu VM can report 8 seconds to mount the tmpfs filesystems, and
100 seconds to unmount them.
Boot the same VM with 1 CPU and it takes 18 seconds to mount the
tmpfs filesystems, but only 36 to unmount.
If we change the synchronize_rcu() to synchronize_rcu_expedited()
the umount time on a 4-cpu VM is 8 seconds to mount and 0.6 to
unmount.
I think this 200-fold speed up is worth the slightly higher system
impact of use synchronize_rcu_expedited().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
Cc: to Paul and Josh in case they'll correct me if using _expedited()
is really bad here.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
fs/namespace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 3b601f115b6c..fce91c447fab 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ static void namespace_unlock(void)
if (likely(hlist_empty(&head)))
return;
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_rcu_expedited();
group_pin_kill(&head);
}
--
2.14.0.rc0.dirty
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists