lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:52:01 +0200
From:   Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:     Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()

Hi Alexey,

> Gentoo ships 5.4.0 which doesn't inline this code on x86_64 defconfig
> (which has OPTIMIZE_INLINING).

I have not actually marked _find_next_bit() inline, it just turns out
that my compiler inlines it.
I've tried out marking the function inline and OPTIMIZE_INLINING does
not un-inline it. I'll send a v4 with an explicit inine.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists