linux-kernel - Re: n900 in next-20170901

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171026044829.GB11791@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:48:29 +0900
From:   Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:31:38AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [171022 21:51]:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:31:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [171019 18:53]:
> > > > Oops... I made a mistak. Could you test with reverting commit
> > > > c977ee2803787363187d6aca9cebdabc793c6531 ("omap: forcibly call
> > > > save_secure_ram_context() for test") in that branch?
> > > > Without reverting it, it doesn't call 'smc' so it always cause a
> > > > hang.
> > > 
> > > Oops I should have noticed that one. Here you go with commit
> > > c977ee280378 reverted. Still not booting.
> > 
> > Still very thanks to you. :)
> 
> No problem, sorry for the delay in testing this one.
> 
> > Okay. Could you test my updated branch? In there, I also disable
> > atomic_pool initialization and disable to remap the CMA area in order
> > to completely make any operation on CMA area as no-op.
> > 
> > And, it enables memblock_debug to check how memblock region is
> > allocated.
> > 
> > https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-debug4-next-20180901
> 
> Great, this branch boots on n900! Early parts of the dmesg attached
> below.

Sound good. Perhaps, problem is due to the cache management. With my
patchset, direct mapping for CMA area is cleared in
dma_contiguous_remap() if CONFIG_HIGHMEM. I guess that proper cache
operation is required there.

Could you test my newly updated branch again? I re-enable
dma_contiguous_remap() to clear direct mapping for CMA area and add
proper(?) cache operation although I'm not the expert on that area.

https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-debug4-next-20180901

Thanks.