linux-kernel - Re: regression in 4.14-rc2 caused by apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1710262105380.11949@localhost>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:06:29 +0200 (CEST)
From:   James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@...onical.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression in 4.14-rc2 caused by apparmor: add base infastructure
 for socket mediation

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
> >
> > What are you unhappy with?
> 
> We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge window:
> 
>  - untested code that clearly didn't do what it claimed it did, and
> which caused me to not even accept the main pull request
> 
>  - apparmor code that had a regression, where it took three weeks for
> that regression to be escalated to me simply because the developer was
> denying the regression.
> 
> Tell me why I *shouldn't* be unhappy with the security layer?
> 
> I shouldn't be in the situation where I start reviewing the code and
> go "that can't be right".
> 
> And I *definitely* shouldn't be in the situation where I need to come
> in three weeks later and tell people what a regression is!

Agreed on both counts, and sorry for these problems.

-- 
James Morris
<james.l.morris@...cle.com>