[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+HYL0VPpzD=BYKMJ5-kuxB2Cn5tUF5RRcczUv_fdv_9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:02:34 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 4/7] of/irq: Adjust of pci irq parsing for multiple interrupts
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Currently we are considering the first irq as the PCI interrupt pin,
> but a pci device may have multiple interrupts(e.g. PCIe WAKE# pin).
>
> Only parse the PCI interrupt pin when the irq is unnamed or named as
> "pci".
Why do you need this patch? You're moving the wakeup handling from the
PCI device to the bridge. The bridge device is not PCI interrupts, but
a platform device so this function doesn't matter.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists