linux-kernel - Re: Proposal: rename tpm1_eventlog.c and tpm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+zpnLfr3bZK0EDEpFP3_UkQX2xe1B3W5b+0r72meJ20XVXUAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:13:32 +0200
From:   Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: rename tpm1_eventlog.c and tpm2_eventlog.c

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 03:18:48PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> > Since this may conflict with the last patch set I sent, are you happy
>> > for me to base this new set on tpmdd/master?
>>
>> What about this: you do an updated version of your patch set that
>> includes these clean ups?
>>
>> PS. Sorry for slowness with your patches. I've just had a lot of stuff
>> going on lately. They are 2nd in my priority queue right after
>> CVE-2017-15361.
>
> This is an awful idea as your patch is in great shape and we want to
> land that feature ASAP. Lets land your patches first and then plan how
> to do the clean up.
>
> I have some other suggestions for the clean up work that require even
> more work. Mainly: I think it would make sense to have an eventlog
> subdirectory for the eventlog as it's growing so complex.
>
> What do you think?

Yes, I would prefer this option as well. Also, agreed on a subdirectory.

>
> /Jarkko