lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 05:26:01 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Query regarding srcu_funnel_exp_start()

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:23:07PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> One query regarding srcu_funnel_exp_start() function in
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c.
> 
> static void srcu_funnel_exp_start(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct
> srcu_node *snp,
> 				  unsigned long s)
> {
> 	<snip>
> 	if (!ULONG_CMP_LT(sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, s))
> 		sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = s;
> 	<snip>
> }
> 
> Why is sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp set to 's' if srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp is >=
> 's'. Shouldn't srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp be equal to the greater of both?

Let's suppose that it is incorrect as currently written.  Can you
construct a test case demonstrating a failure of some sort, then provide
a fix?

To start with, if it is currently incorrect, what would be the nature
of the failure?

							Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ