[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB5PR04MB12406C4B672814CB61FCB97FEA5A0@DB5PR04MB1240.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:26 +0000
From: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Don't account SWA in
tx_data_offset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:34 PM
> To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
> Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Don't account SWA in
> tx_data_offset
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:31:22PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:27 PM
> > > To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
> > > Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>;
> > > gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Don't account SWA in
> > > tx_data_offset
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:11:34PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > > > When configuring the Tx buffer layout, the software annotation size is
> > > > mentioned, and MC accounts for it when configuring the frame
> > > > tx_data_offset. No need to handle it in the driver as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The impact is that we allocate slightly less memory right?
> >
> > Yes, 64B per frame.
>
> Ok. Cool. Please put this kind of stuff in the changelog. At first I
> thought it was maybe a buffer overflow just from reading what was in the
> email without looking at the code.
Okay, will update in v2.
Thank you!
Bogdan P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists