[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62bb0948-f763-d726-9a88-d5cc2b2e2c9c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:24:05 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v5 3/3] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Update
fusb302 type string, add properties
Hi,
On 27-10-17 12:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:31:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27-10-17 12:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 26-10-17 22:33, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> The fusb302 driver as merged in staging uses "typec_fusb302" as i2c-id
>>>>> rather then just "fusb302" and needs us to set a number of device-
>>>>> properties, adjust the intel_cht_int33fe driver accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the properties set is max-snk-mv which makes the fusb302 driver
>>>>> negotiate up to 12V charging voltage, which is a bad idea on boards
>>>>> which are not setup to handle this, so this commit also adds 2 extra
>>>>> sanity checks to make sure that the expected Whiskey Cove PMIC +
>>>>> TI bq24292i charger combo, which can handle 12V, is present.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> I can't apply this one. Is there an immutable branch I need to pick up?
>>>> Or shall this go via another tree? My base is v4.14-rc5.
>>>
>>> It should be applied on top of this patch:
>>>
>>> http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commitdiff/5c003458db40cf3c89aeddd22c6e934c28b5a565
>>>
>>> From linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/for-next.
>>>
>>> So either we are going to need an immutable branch from you
>>> with the first patch of this series so that the platform/x86
>>> maintainers can merge this, or the other way around :|
>>
>> Alternatively we could push this patch as a post rc1 fix I guess.
>
> I intentionally did not push out yet until this was cleared. So, I think
> the most simple option is that I create an immutable branch with only
> the i2c patches from you. Then linux-platform maintainers can pull in
> my branch and your patch here on top of that. Would be my favourite.
>
> D'accord everyone?
Works for me, ack.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists