[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4eec401-a4ac-263e-97ec-21eb347b0afc@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:26:14 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Abderrahmane Benbachir <abderrahmane.benbachir@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jeyu@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhocko@...e.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
thomas.lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: check for null pointer before calling
initcall
On 10/27/2017 11:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, David Daney wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/2017 09:47 AM, Abderrahmane Benbachir wrote:
>>> Simple check to prevent kernel panic when initcall does not exit
>>
>> Interesting, under what circumstances do you observe the panic?
>>
>> It would be best to include this information in the patch changelog.
>
> device_initcall(NULL);
>
> might do that, but then it rightfully crashes on boot.
>
That was kind of my point. The module loader case already checks for a
non-NULL pointer, and any NULLs in the in-kernel initializer tables
would indicate a bigger problem that should be fixed instead.
David Daney
Powered by blists - more mailing lists