lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:26:14 -0700
From:   David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Abderrahmane Benbachir <abderrahmane.benbachir@...ymtl.ca>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jeyu@...hat.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mhocko@...e.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: check for null pointer before calling
 initcall

On 10/27/2017 11:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, David Daney wrote:
> 
>> On 10/27/2017 09:47 AM, Abderrahmane Benbachir wrote:
>>> Simple check to prevent kernel panic when initcall does not exit
>>
>> Interesting, under what circumstances do you observe the panic?
>>
>> It would be best to include this information in the patch changelog.
> 
> device_initcall(NULL);
> 
> might do that, but then it rightfully crashes on boot.
> 

That was kind of my point.  The module loader case already checks for a 
non-NULL pointer, and any NULLs in the in-kernel initializer tables 
would indicate a bigger problem that should be fixed instead.

David Daney

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ