[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpU0XFuj_Qc_Usug5=ymRWGU0nhQyPso6O=VbhPKAMa91Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:18:16 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
syzbot
<bot+ea75c0ffcd353d32515f064aaebefc5279e6161e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tom@...ntonium.net,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, ebiggers@...gle.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in get_work_pool
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:35:44AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __read_once_size
>>> include/linux/compiler.h:276 [inline]
>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic64_read
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:21 [inline]
>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_long_read
>>> include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:44 [inline]
>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in get_work_pool+0x1c2/0x1e0
>>> kernel/workqueue.c:709
>>> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8801cc58c378 by task syz-executor5/21326
>>>
>>> CPU: 1 PID: 21326 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 4.13.0+ #43
>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine,
>>> BIOS Google 01/01/2011
>>> Call Trace:
>>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:16 [inline]
>>> dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:52
>>> print_address_description+0x73/0x250 mm/kasan/report.c:252
>>> kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:351 [inline]
>>> kasan_report+0x24e/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:409
>>> __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report.c:430
>>> __read_once_size include/linux/compiler.h:276 [inline]
>>> atomic64_read arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:21 [inline]
>>> atomic_long_read include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:44 [inline]
>>> get_work_pool+0x1c2/0x1e0 kernel/workqueue.c:709
>>> __queue_work+0x235/0x1150 kernel/workqueue.c:1401
>>> queue_work_on+0x16a/0x1c0 kernel/workqueue.c:1486
>>> queue_work include/linux/workqueue.h:489 [inline]
>>> strp_check_rcv+0x25/0x30 net/strparser/strparser.c:553
>>> kcm_attach net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1439 [inline]
>>> kcm_attach_ioctl net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1460 [inline]
>>> kcm_ioctl+0x826/0x1610 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1695
>>> sock_do_ioctl+0x65/0xb0 net/socket.c:961
>>> sock_ioctl+0x2c2/0x440 net/socket.c:1058
>>> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:45 [inline]
>>> do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b1/0x1530 fs/ioctl.c:685
>>> SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:700 [inline]
>>> SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:691
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
>>
>> Looks like kcm is trying to reuse a work item whose last workqueue has
>> been destroyed without re-initing it. A work item needs to be
>> reinit'd.
>
> +kcm maintainers
Can you try the fix below? There is no C reproducer so I can't verify it.
diff --git a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
index af4e76ac88ff..7816f44c576a 100644
--- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
+++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
@@ -1433,11 +1433,12 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *sock,
struct socket *csock,
KCM_STATS_INCR(mux->stats.psock_attach);
mux->psocks_cnt++;
psock_now_avail(psock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&mux->lock);
/* Schedule RX work in case there are already bytes queued */
strp_check_rcv(&psock->strp);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mux->lock);
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists