[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171027213337.GB105121@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:33:38 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, dianders@...omium.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 2/7] of/irq: Adjust of_pci_irq parsing for
multiple interrupts
Hi Jeffy,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 03:26:07PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Currently we are considering the first irq as the PCI interrupt pin,
> but a PCI device may have multiple interrupts(e.g. PCIe WAKE# pin).
>
> Only parse the PCI interrupt pin when the irq is unnamed or named as
> "pci".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v10: None
> Changes in v9: None
> Changes in v8: None
> Changes in v7: None
> Changes in v6: None
> Changes in v5: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c b/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
> index 3a05568f65df..8b69211f0b88 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,18 @@ int of_irq_parse_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq
> */
> dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
> if (dn) {
> - rc = of_irq_parse_one(dn, 0, out_irq);
> + struct property *prop;
> + const char *name;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + prop = of_find_property(dn, "interrupt-names", NULL);
> + for (name = of_prop_next_string(prop, NULL); name;
> + name = of_prop_next_string(prop, name), index++) {
> + if (!strcmp(name, "pci"))
> + break;
> + }
You seem to have expanded of_property_for_each_string(). You could also
do this more clearly with:
of_property_for_each_string(dn, "interrupt-names", prop, name) {
if (!strcmp(name, "pci"))
break;
index++;
}
> +
> + rc = of_irq_parse_one(dn, index, out_irq);
> if (!rc)
> return rc;
Suppose you provide a "wakeup" interrupt but no "pci" interrupt: are you
sure you're properly falling back to the tree-walking INTx discovery? At
this point, 'index' will be out of bounds, so I guess you rely on
of_irq_parse_one(dn, OUT_OF_BOUNDS, out_irq) returning an error?
It seems like you could also be sure to skip the IRQ parsing in that
case by writing this:
/*
* Only parse from DT if we have no "interrupt-names",
* or if we found an interrupt named "pci".
*/
if (index == 0 || name) {
rc = of_irq_parse_one(dn, index, out_irq);
if (!rc)
return rc;
}
Brian
> }
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists