Message-Id: <1509148310-30862-3-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:51:39 -0700
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, ricardo.neri@...el.com,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 02/13] x86/insn-eval: Compute linear address in several utility functions

Computing a linear address involves several steps. The first step is to
compute the effective address. This involves determining the addressing
mode in use and perform arithmetic operations on the operands. Plus, each
addressing mode has special cases that must be handled.

Once the effective address is known, the base address of the applicable
segment is added to obtain the linear address.

Clearly, this is too much work for a single function. Instead, handle each
addressing mode in a separate utility function. This improves readability
and gives us the opportunity to handler errors better.

At the moment, arithmetic to compute the effective address uses 8-byte
variables. Thus, limit support to 64-bit addresses.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 186 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 91f08aa..4aa3c48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -776,6 +776,182 @@ static int get_seg_base_limit(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * get_eff_addr_reg() - Obtain effective address from register operand
+ * @insn:	Instruction. Must be valid.
+ * @regs:	Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @regoff:	Obtained operand offset, in pt_regs, with the effective address
+ * @eff_addr:	Obtained effective address
+ *
+ * Obtain the effective address stored in the register operand as indicated by
+ * the ModRM byte. This function is to be used only with register addressing
+ * (i.e.,  ModRM.mod is 3). The effective address is saved in @eff_addr. The
+ * register operand, as an offset from the base of pt_regs, is saved in @regoff;
+ * such offset can then be used to resolve the segment associated with the
+ * operand. This function can be used with any of the supported address sizes
+ * in x86.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * 0 on success. @eff_addr will have the effective address stored in the
+ * operand indicated by ModRM. @regoff will have such operand as an offset from
+ * the base of pt_regs.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL on error.
+ */
+static int get_eff_addr_reg(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			    int *regoff, long *eff_addr)
+{
+	insn_get_modrm(insn);
+
+	if (!insn->modrm.nbytes)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) != 3)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	*regoff = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
+	if (*regoff < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	*eff_addr = (long)regs_get_register(regs, *regoff);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * get_eff_addr_modrm() - Obtain referenced effective address via ModRM
+ * @insn:	Instruction. Must be valid.
+ * @regs:	Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @regoff:	Obtained operand offset, in pt_regs, associated with segment
+ * @eff_addr:	Obtained effective address
+ *
+ * Obtain the effective address referenced by the ModRM byte of @insn. After
+ * identifying the registers involved in the register-indirect memory reference,
+ * its value is obtained from the operands in @regs. The computed address is
+ * stored @eff_addr. Also, the register operand that indicates the associated
+ * segment is stored in @regoff, this parameter can later be used to determine
+ * such segment. This function can be used for both 32-bit and 64-bit effective
+ * addresses.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * 0 on success. @eff_addr will have the referenced effective address. @regoff
+ * will have a register, as an offset from the base of pt_regs, that can be used
+ * to resolve the associated segment.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL on error.
+ */
+static int get_eff_addr_modrm(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			      int *regoff, long *eff_addr)
+{
+	long tmp;
+
+	if (insn->addr_bytes != 8)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	insn_get_modrm(insn);
+
+	if (!insn->modrm.nbytes)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) > 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	*regoff = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
+	/*
+	 * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
+	 * in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
+	 * following instruction.
+	 */
+	if (*regoff == -EDOM) {
+		if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
+			tmp = (long)regs->ip + insn->length;
+		else
+			tmp = 0;
+	} else if (*regoff < 0) {
+		return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		tmp = (long)regs_get_register(regs, *regoff);
+	}
+
+	*eff_addr = tmp + insn->displacement.value;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * get_eff_addr_sib() - Obtain referenced effective address via SIB
+ * @insn:	Instruction. Must be valid.
+ * @regs:	Register values as seen when entering kernel mode
+ * @regoff:	Obtained operand offset, in pt_regs, associated with segment
+ * @eff_addr:	Obtained effective address
+ *
+ * Obtain the effective address referenced by the SIB byte of @insn. After
+ * identifying the registers involved in the indexed, register-indirect memory
+ * reference, its value is obtained from the operands in @regs. The computed
+ * address is stored @eff_addr. Also, the register operand that indicates the
+ * associated segment is stored in @regoff, this parameter can later be used to
+ * determine such segment. This function can be used for both 32-bit and 64-bit
+ * effective addresses.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *
+ * 0 on success. @eff_addr will have the referenced effective address. @regoff
+ * will have a register, as an offset from the base of pt_regs, that can be used
+ * to resolve the associated segment.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL on error.
+ */
+static int get_eff_addr_sib(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			    int *base_offset, long *eff_addr)
+{
+	long base, indx;
+	int indx_offset;
+
+	if (insn->addr_bytes != 8)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	insn_get_modrm(insn);
+
+	if (!insn->modrm.nbytes)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) > 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	insn_get_sib(insn);
+
+	if (!insn->sib.nbytes)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	*base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE);
+	indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
+	/*
+	 * Negative values in the base and index offset means an error when
+	 * decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM, which means that the registers
+	 * should not be used in the address computation.
+	 */
+	if (*base_offset == -EDOM)
+		base = 0;
+	else if (*base_offset < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	else
+		base = (long)regs_get_register(regs, *base_offset);
+
+	if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
+		indx = 0;
+	else if (indx_offset < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	else
+		indx = (long)regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
+
+	*eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(insn->sib.value));
+
+	*eff_addr += insn->displacement.value;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 /*
  * return the address being referenced be instruction
  * for rm=3 returning the content of the rm reg
@@ -783,75 +959,28 @@ static int get_seg_base_limit(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
  */
 void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	int addr_offset, base_offset, indx_offset, ret;
 	unsigned long linear_addr = -1L, seg_base;
-	long eff_addr, base, indx;
-	insn_byte_t sib;
-
-	insn_get_modrm(insn);
-	insn_get_sib(insn);
-	sib = insn->sib.value;
+	int addr_offset, ret;
+	long eff_addr;
 
 	if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 3) {
-		addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-		if (addr_offset < 0)
+		ret = get_eff_addr_reg(insn, regs, &addr_offset, &eff_addr);
+		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 
-		eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
-
 	} else {
 		if (insn->sib.nbytes) {
-			/*
-			 * Negative values in the base and index offset means
-			 * an error when decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM,
-			 * which means that the registers should not be used
-			 * in the address computation.
-			 */
-			base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE);
-			if (base_offset == -EDOM)
-				base = 0;
-			else if (base_offset < 0)
+			ret = get_eff_addr_sib(insn, regs, &addr_offset,
+					       &eff_addr);
+			if (ret)
 				goto out;
-			else
-				base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
-
-			indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
-
-			if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
-				indx = 0;
-			else if (indx_offset < 0)
-				goto out;
-			else
-				indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
-
-			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
-
-			/*
-			 * The base determines the segment used to compute
-			 * the linear address.
-			 */
-			addr_offset = base_offset;
-
 		} else {
-			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-			/*
-			 * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset.
-			 * In such a case, in 64-bit mode the effective address
-			 * relative to the RIP of the following instruction.
-			 */
-			if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
-				if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
-					eff_addr = (long)regs->ip + insn->length;
-				else
-					eff_addr = 0;
-			} else if (addr_offset < 0) {
+			ret = get_eff_addr_modrm(insn, regs, &addr_offset,
+						 &eff_addr);
+			if (ret)
 				goto out;
-			} else {
-				eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
-			}
 		}
 
-		eff_addr += insn->displacement.value;
 	}
 
 	ret = get_seg_base_limit(insn, regs, addr_offset, &seg_base, NULL);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists