[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1509195507-29037-9-git-send-email-houtao1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 20:58:27 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<jbaron@...mai.com>, <oleg@...hat.com>, <dave@...olabs.net>,
<koct9i@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] epoll: protect the iteration of ep->rbr by ep->mtx in ep_free()
When ep_free() iterates the epi in ep->rbr, the epi may be removed
by eventpoll_release_file(). To protect again the case, acquiring
ep->mtx before the iteration of ep->rbr.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index cd7a9f4..7618fb5 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
/*
* Walks through the whole tree by unregistering poll callbacks.
*/
+ mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
@@ -885,7 +886,6 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
* We do not need to lock ep->mtx, either, we only do it to prevent
* a lockdep warning.
*/
- mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
while ((rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
--
2.7.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists