lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171028161422.GA6263@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:14:22 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        cphealy@...il.com, Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v9,4/5] watchdog: Add RAVE SP watchdog driver

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:04:20PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> This driver provides access to RAVE SP watchdog functionality.
> 
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: cphealy@...il.com
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> Guenter:
> 
> In our previous discussion you noted that relying on the state of
> WDOG_HW_RUNNING was not correct (that should be fixed now), please let
> me know if using watchdog_hw_running() the way I do in
> rave_sp_wdt_set_timeout() is incorrect as well.
> 

You could as well have used watchdog_active(), but it is ok.

> Thanks,
> Andrey Smirnov
> 
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig       |   7 +
>  drivers/watchdog/Makefile      |   1 +
>  drivers/watchdog/rave-sp-wdt.c | 343 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 351 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/rave-sp-wdt.c
> 
[ ... ]

> +
> +static int rave_sp_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	const struct of_device_id *id;
> +	struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> +	struct rave_sp_wdt *sp_wd;
> +	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
> +	__le16 timeout = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	id = of_match_device(rave_sp_wdt_variants, dev->parent);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!id))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

I could understand an error message here, but why a traceback ?

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ