linux-kernel - [RFC] Testing builds with Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:27:20 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
To:     lkp@...ts.01.org
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] Testing builds with Clang

Hello,
Recently, a fair amount of effort has gone into compiling the kernel
with Clang/LLVM.  We were curious what might be some of the
requirements to getting 0-day coverage for Clang built kernels?

https://lwn.net/Articles/734071/

As in, does Clang need to support allmodconfig, randconfig, all
ARCH's, etc before 0-day can be turned on?  Such requirements can help
us set goals.

Also, is https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests the codebase for the 0-day bot?

Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers