lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:27:20 -0700 From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com> To: lkp@...ts.01.org Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>, Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [RFC] Testing builds with Clang Hello, Recently, a fair amount of effort has gone into compiling the kernel with Clang/LLVM. We were curious what might be some of the requirements to getting 0-day coverage for Clang built kernels? https://lwn.net/Articles/734071/ As in, does Clang need to support allmodconfig, randconfig, all ARCH's, etc before 0-day can be turned on? Such requirements can help us set goals. Also, is https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests the codebase for the 0-day bot? Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists