[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171028174759.f0e161980b69f35d4fe1c74f@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 17:47:59 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
Cc: <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kprobes: initialize probed_mod to NULL
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:23:15 +0800
Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com> wrote:
> When check_kprobe_address_safe() return fail, the probed_mod
> should be set to NULL, because no module refcount held. And we
> initialize probed_mod to NULL in register_kprobe() for the same reason.
>
Ok, it's a kind of hardening code but looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you!
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 1eeedac..a04588c 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1488,6 +1488,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> * its code to prohibit unexpected unloading.
> */
> if (unlikely(!try_module_get(*probed_mod))) {
> + *probed_mod = NULL;
> ret = -ENOENT;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1514,7 +1515,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> int ret;
> struct kprobe *old_p;
> - struct module *probed_mod;
> + struct module *probed_mod = NULL;
> kprobe_opcode_t *addr;
>
> /* Adjust probe address from symbol */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists