lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 02:59:40 -0700 From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, "Cc: Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Cc: Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@....com>, "Cc: Patrick Bellasi" <patrick.bellasi@....com>, "Cc: Steve Muckle" <smuckle@...gle.com>, "Cc: Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@....com>, "Cc: Chris Redpath" <Chris.Redpath@....com>, "Cc: Atish Patra" <atish.patra@...cle.com>, "Cc: Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, "Cc: Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, "Cc: Morten Ramussen" <morten.rasmussen@....com>, "Cc: Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>, "Cc: Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Cc: EAS Dev" <eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com> Subject: [PATCH RFC 4/5] sched/fair: Correct obsolete comment about cpufreq_update_util Since the remote cpufreq callback work, the cpufreq_update_util call can happen from remote CPUs. The comment about local CPUs is thus obsolete. Update it accordingly. Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 4c06e52935d3..5c49fdb4c508 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3018,9 +3018,7 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) /* * There are a few boundary cases this might miss but it should * get called often enough that that should (hopefully) not be - * a real problem -- added to that it only calls on the local - * CPU, so if we enqueue remotely we'll miss an update, but - * the next tick/schedule should update. + * a real problem. * * It will not get called when we go idle, because the idle * thread is a different class (!fair), nor will the utilization -- 2.15.0.rc2.357.g7e34df9404-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists