linux-kernel - [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171028115709.4622-1-chao@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2017 19:57:09 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry"

From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>

This reverts commit 5e443818fa0b2a2845561ee25bec181424fb2889

The commit should be reverted because call sequence of below two parts
of code must be kept:
a. update sit information, it needs to be updated before segment
allocation since latter allocation may trigger SSR, and SSR allocation
needs latest valid block information of all segments.
b. update segment status, it needs to be updated after segment allocation
since we can skip updating current opened segment status.

Fixes: 5e443818fa0b ("f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry")
Suggested-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 0de1761928d3..644706000e31 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1899,9 +1899,6 @@ void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t old, block_t new)
 	update_sit_entry(sbi, new, 1);
 	if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old) != NULL_SEGNO)
 		update_sit_entry(sbi, old, -1);
-
-	locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old));
-	locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, new));
 }
 
 void invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t addr)
@@ -2540,13 +2537,22 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
 
 	stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg);
 
+	/*
+	 * SIT information should be updated before segment allocation,
+	 * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
+	 */
+	refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
+
 	if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type))
 		sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false);
+
 	/*
-	 * SIT information should be updated after segment allocation,
-	 * since we need to keep dirty segments precisely under SSR.
+	 * segment dirty status should be updated after segment allocation,
+	 * so we just need to update status only one time after previous
+	 * segment being closed.
 	 */
-	refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
+	locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr));
+	locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, *new_blkaddr));
 
 	mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
 
-- 
2.14.1.145.gb3622a4ee