linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: pxa: move header file out of deprecated i2c folder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 29 Oct 2017 21:34:00 +0100
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
        Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: pxa: move header file out of deprecated i2c folder

Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> writes:

Hi Wolfram,

> Wouldn't it be even cleaner if patch 1 & 2 above would be swapped? First
> move the chunk, then rename the file?
Yeah sure.

> And is there a branch I should base this on? Currently, I am thinking of
> basing this patch on for-next and then submit it around rc1 time.
>
> Does that make sense to you?
Yeah that's good. I usually make my pull requests around -rc5, that gives enough
time to review and test on my side.

As for the base, for-next is exactly pxa/for-next as no patches are pending, so
go ahead and base your work on it please.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert