linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next 1/1] ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: reset SSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87d155ttv2.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date:   Sun, 29 Oct 2017 23:38:57 +0000
From:   Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To:     <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc:     <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <tiwai@...e.com>, <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next 1/1] ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: reset SSI_MODE register


Hi Jiada

> register SSI_MODE is set when SSI works in TDM Extended or
> TDM (Ex-)Split mode, but it isn't reset after SSI stops.
> this will cause issue, if SSI starts to work in other modes
> which requie SSI_MODE to have different value.
> 
> This patch resets SSI_MODE register in .stop callback,
> when last stream calls .stop.
> 
> Fixes: 186fadc132f0 ("ASoC: rsnd: add TDM Extend Mode support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
> index 4d94875..eff9f3b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ static int rsnd_ssiu_stop_gen2(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
>  	if (rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(io))
>  		rsnd_mod_write(mod, SSI_CONTROL, 0);
>  
> +	rsnd_mod_write(mod, SSI_MODE, 0);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Thank you for your patch.
But, I don't want to reset register when stop, because
it might be point-less if SoC has power domain.
How about this or similar (not tested) ?

------------------
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
index 4d94875..8dc2e92 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
@@ -130,14 +130,13 @@ static int rsnd_ssiu_init_gen2(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (rsnd_runtime_is_ssi_tdm(io)) {
-		/*
-		 * TDM Extend Mode
-		 * see
-		 *	rsnd_ssi_config_init()
-		 */
-		rsnd_mod_write(mod, SSI_MODE, 0x1);
-	}
+	/*
+	 * TDM Extend Mode
+	 * see
+	 *	rsnd_ssi_config_init()
+	 */
+	rsnd_mod_write(mod, SSI_MODE,
+		       rsnd_runtime_is_ssi_tdm(io) ? 0x1 : 0x0);
 
 	if (rsnd_ssi_use_busif(io)) {
 		rsnd_mod_write(mod, SSI_BUSIF_ADINR,


Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto