[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030081753.GG1370@distanz.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:17:54 +0100
From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
lipeng <lipeng321@...wei.com>, Kejian Yan <yankejian@...wei.com>,
Lin Yun Sheng <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: hns: set correct return value
On 2017-10-29 at 15:35:32 +0100, Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com> wrote:
> The function of_parse_phandle() returns a NULL pointer if it cannot
> resolve a phandle property to a device_node pointer. In function
> hns_nic_dev_probe(), its return value is passed to PTR_ERR to extract
> the error code. However, in this case, the extracted error code will
> always be zero, which is unexpected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
The subject is missing a [PATCH] prefix which causes the patch e.g. to
not show up on patchwork [1]. Care to resend with the proper subject?
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
Care to resend with the proper subject?
For the patch itself:
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists