linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB5PR04MB12403B8260FD5CFCD11A83B5EA590@DB5PR04MB1240.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:16:33 +0000
From:   Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 10:56 AM
> To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
> Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment
> 
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:44:37PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:30 PM
> > > To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
> > > Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>;
> > > gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:11:35PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > > > @@ -93,10 +100,10 @@
> > > >   * buffers large enough to allow building an skb around them and also
> > > account
> > > >   * for alignment restrictions
> > > >   */
> > > > -#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE \
> > > > +#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE(priv) \
> > > >  	(DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_SIZE + \
> > > >  	SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + \
> > > > -	DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_ALIGN)
> > > > +	(priv)->rx_buf_align)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not related to this patch, but this macro is ugly.  It would be better
> > > as function.
> >
> > Okay, will change the macros to inline functions in v2, where applicable.
> >
> 
> You didn't need to do that, because I said it was "not related to this
> change".  I try not to make people redo paches for stuff like this.  But
> thanks, it looks nicer now.

I agree with you, it does look better with inline functions. I know the change
wasn't absolutely necessary, but the code is easier on the eyes in v2, so I
thought it was good enough reason to go for it.

Thanks for the feedback! :)
Bogdan P.