linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHLCerPfUva8_ga_LywW6dKxTwno4fTKiEphsvdBLptByRUROA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:20:12 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     andy.gross@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        lakml <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Amit Kucheria
<amit.kucheria@...durent.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org> wrote:
>> This series deletes three config options related to USB on Qualcomm
>> SoCs from the arm64 "defconfig".  The code enabled by the options is
>> no longer needed by any Qualcomm hardware.
>>
>>                                         -Alex
>
>
> Shouldn't we remove the driver code too in the case that no HW actually uses it?

Nevermind, I just found the other thread that removes the actual driver code.

FWIW, for the entire series, feel free to add my Reviewed-by.