| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <001101d35175$54987f20$fdc97d60$@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 19:50:01 +0800
From: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, 'Chao Yu' <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: 'Chao Yu' <yuchao0@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add a function to move nid
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 5:30 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Fan Li; 'Chao Yu'; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add a function to move nid
>
> On 10/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2017/10/28 19:03, Fan Li wrote:
> > > This patch add a new function to move nid from one state to another.
> > > Move operation is heavily used, by adding a new function for it we
> > > can cut down some branches from several flow.
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 51
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index ac629d6..8116b50
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > @@ -1763,15 +1763,13 @@ static struct free_nid
> > > *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, }
> > >
> > > static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > - struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool new)
> > > + struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
> > > {
> > > struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> > >
> > > - if (new) {
> > > - int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> > > - if (err)
> > > - return err;
> > > - }
> > > + int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > >
> > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, state != i->state);
> > > nm_i->nid_cnt[state]++;
> > > @@ -1781,7 +1779,7 @@ static int __insert_free_nid(struct
> > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi, }
> > >
> > > static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > - struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool reuse)
> > > + struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
> > > {
> > > struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> > >
> > > @@ -1789,8 +1787,23 @@ static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > nm_i->nid_cnt[state]--;
> > > if (state == FREE_NID)
> > > list_del(&i->list);
> > > - if (!reuse)
> > > - radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> > > + radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid); }
> > > +
> > > +static void __move_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct free_nid *i,
> > > + enum nid_state org_state, enum nid_state dst_state) {
> > > + struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> > > +
> > > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, org_state != i->state);
> > > + i->state = dst_state;
> > > + nm_i->nid_cnt[org_state]--;
> > > + nm_i->nid_cnt[dst_state]++;
> > > +
> > > + if (org_state == FREE_NID)
> >
> > Welcome back to community, Fan. :)
> >
> > Minor, how about "if (dst_stat == PREALLOC_NID)" ?
>
> How about this?
>
> switch (dst_state) {
> case PREALLOC_NID:
> list_del(&i->list);
> break;
> case FREE_NID:
> list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
> break;
> default:
> BUG_ON(1);
> };
>
I had thought about it, the reason why I finally chose the current version is because
" dst_state== PREALLOC_NID" implies that all states other than PREALLOC_NID
are in a list, so we need to call list_del.
Of course it's true now, but in the future if we add more states which aren't in a list,
it would be harder for us to track this branch to modify it since it's not related to
FREE_NID explicitly.
However the difference is trivial, if you think it's not a big deal, it's fine by me.
> >
> > Otherwise this patch looks good to me, anyway, you can add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > > + list_del(&i->list);
> > > + else if (dst_state == FREE_NID)
> > > + list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* return if the nid is recognized as free */ @@ -1850,7 +1863,7 @@
> > > static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
> > > }
> > > }
> > > ret = true;
> > > - err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> > > + err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
> > > err_out:
> > > spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > radix_tree_preload_end();
> > > @@ -1869,7 +1882,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> > > spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> > > if (i && i->state == FREE_NID) {
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> > > + __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
> > > need_free = true;
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > @@ -2080,9 +2093,7 @@ bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid)
> > > struct free_nid, list);
> > > *nid = i->nid;
> > >
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> > > - i->state = PREALLOC_NID;
> > > - __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> > > + __move_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, PREALLOC_NID);
> > > nm_i->available_nids--;
> > >
> > > update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, *nid, false, false); @@ -2108,7
> > > +2119,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> > > spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> > > + __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
> > > spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > >
> > > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i); @@ -2131,12 +2142,10 @@ void
> > > alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
> > >
> > > if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> > > + __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
> > > need_free = true;
> > > } else {
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, true);
> > > - i->state = FREE_NID;
> > > - __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> > > + __move_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, FREE_NID);
> > > }
> > >
> > > nm_i->available_nids++;
> > > @@ -2167,7 +2176,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
> > > nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> > > + __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
> > > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> > > nr_shrink--;
> > > }
> > > @@ -2746,7 +2755,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > /* destroy free nid list */
> > > spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> > > - __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> > > + __remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
> > > spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> > > spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists