[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030121257.GA28737@marvin.atrad.com.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:42:57 +1030
From: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>, Harvey <harv@....de>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Fix radio LED detection
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> >> > Radio LED detection method implemented in commit 4f62568c1fcf
> >> > ("fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED") turned out to be incorrect as it
> >> > causes a radio LED to be erroneously detected on a Fujitsu Lifebook E751
> >> > which has a slide switch (and thus no radio LED). Use bit 17 of
> >> > flags_supported (the value returned by method S000 of ACPI device
> >> > FUJ02E3) to determine whether a radio LED is present as it seems to be a
> >> > more reliable indicator, based on comparing DSDT tables of four Fujitsu
> >> > Lifebook models (E744, E751, S7110, S8420).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
> >
> > I forgot that this patch can also be tagged with:
> >
> > Fixes: 4f62568c1fcf ("fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED")
>
> Added.
>
> Do you consider this an important fix? We are at -rc7 now, I'm not
> sure it's so critical. Tell me if you consider otherwise.
I agree - from my perspective I wouldn't have thought it so critical as to
push it out this late in the development cycle. It's not a regression as
such and is largely cosmetic. Others may argue differently though.
BTW, it looks like you may have missed my Reviewed-by tag on this patch,
sent on 25 Oct. There was also a Tested-by added by Heinrich Siebmanns on
the same day:
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
Tested-by: Heinrich Siebmanns <harv@....de>
Or perhaps such peripheral tags aren't carried forward on patches like this,
in which case it's a moot point.
Regards
jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists