[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030030354.fifvokpkcp4g2pdw@sasha-lappy>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 03:03:56 +0000
From: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-4.1.y] tools include: Add a __fallthrough statement
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:05:58PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>
>commit b5bf1733d6a391c4e90ea8f8468d83023be74a2a upstream.
>
>For cases where implicit fall through case labels are intended,
>to let us inform that to gcc >= 7:
>
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/string.o
> util/string.c: In function 'perf_atoll':
> util/string.c:22:7: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
> if (*p)
> ^
> util/string.c:24:3: note: here
> case '\0':
> ^~~~
>
>So we introduce:
>
> #define __fallthrough __attribute__ ((fallthrough))
>
>And use it in such cases.
Queued up, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists