[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKdihXUxEewyYTQFSQDaeKQbD9ja-8DxDv022cxDRA5KCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:42:11 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] fsnotify: pin both inode and vfsmount mark
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 25-10-17 10:41:34, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> We may fail to pin one of the marks in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() when
>> dropping the srcu read lock, resulting in use after free at the next
>> iteration.
>>
>> Solution is to store both marks in iter_info instead of just the one we'll
>> be sending the event for.
>
> I'm sorry but I'm not getting it. Where exactly is use-after-free
> happening? And how come because if fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fails to
> pin some mark, it does not drop SRCU and bails out, doesn't it?
No no. It's the success case, when we do drop SRCU.
Two marks non-NULL marks: inode_mark, vfsmount_mark. We select one
with fsnotify_compare_groups(), e.g. cmp < 0: vfsmount_mark set to
NULL.
So we pin inode_mark but not vfsmount_mark. Then we find the next
mark for inode_mark, and use non-NULL vfsmount_node to find the same
vfsmount_mark that we started out previously. But that one was not
pinned while SRCU was released -> use after free.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists