[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc692c11-63f8-a914-8767-1fc4248faae8@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:44:31 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Eyal Reizer <eyalr@...com>, Iain Hunter <drhunter95@...il.com>,
James Minor <james.minor@...com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Maxim Altshul <maxim.altshul@...com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wlcore: Use common error handling code in
wlcore_set_beacon_template()
>> @@ -4081,9 +4078,8 @@ static int wlcore_set_beacon_template(struct wl1271 *wl,
>> beacon->data,
>> beacon->len, 0,
>> min_rate);
>> -end_bcn:
>> +free_skb:
>
> Why rename the label?
I find it clearer according to the Linux coding style.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists