[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e041a3f-823f-08ce-a653-a02b71e2cb6b@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:56:13 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v6 32/38] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV
DEBUG_DECRYPT command
On 10/27/17 3:25 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + } else {
>> + memcpy((void *)dst_kaddr, page_address(tpage) + offset, size);
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c: In function ‘svm_mem_enc_op’:
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c:6115:4: warning: argument 1 null where non-null expected [-Wnonnull]
> memcpy((void *)dst_kaddr, page_address(tpage) + offset, size);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/string.h:4:0,
> from ./include/linux/string.h:18,
> from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8,
> from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:4,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:10,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:20,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:4,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:52,
> from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:37,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
> from ./include/linux/preempt.h:80,
> from ./include/linux/hardirq.h:4,
> from ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:10,
> from arch/x86/kvm/svm.c:20:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h:31:14: note: in a call to function ‘memcpy’ declared here
> extern void *memcpy(void *to, const void *from, size_t len);
> ^~~~~~
>
I am not able to reproduce the build warning in my setup, what config
option or compiler you are using to trigger this issue ? I am on
Fedora with gcc 6.4.x. Logically, the code looks okay. I can try to
rearrange code to fix the warning. I have not touched this function
since couple of rev, have u seen similar warning in previous versions
(v5, v4 etc). thanks
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists