linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171030145526.GB3252168@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:55:26 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc:     Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root
 cgroup in cgroups v2

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
> cgroup.
> 
> This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
> as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
> generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
> governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.
> 
> By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
> times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.
> 
> cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
> However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
> tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
> weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
> Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.
> 
> Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
> be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
> (for a good reason).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>

I don't think we wanna do this.  It's inconsistent with what other
controllers do and we want to charge the IOs in the root cgroup to the
right cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun