[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030155029.GP20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:50:30 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>,
Sven Schmidt <4sschmid@...ormatik.uni-hamburg.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Petr Cvek <petrcvekcz@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: add a private asm/unaligned.h
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 04:09:43PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> > There's three things wrong, all of which I have patches to address:
> >
> > 1. The decompressor code reading the image data sometimes issues unaligned
> > reads. Some compilers get this wrong and cause an abort. Arnds patch
> > addresses this.
> >
> > 2. Additional sections can appear in the zImage binary which adds extra
> > bytes on the end of the image. Concatenating the zImage with the
> > extra bytes onto a DTB is the same thing as doing this:
> >
> > cat zImage extrabytes foo.dtb > image
> >
> > and the decompressor tolerates no additional bytes between the
> > _official_ end of the zImage and the DTB. I've added a patch which
> > detects this situation and fails the kernel build when it happens.
> >
> > 3. Ard's patch "efi/libstub: arm: omit sorting of the UEFI memory map"
> > gets rid of the additional sections that (a) change the alignment
> > of the compressed data, and (b) add additional unexpected bytes on
> > the end of zImage.
>
> It's possible that we still need yet another patch to address the gcc bug that
> Alex Graf found, i.e. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82445
>
> Without the latest gcc, we might still get into a situation in which we get
> an unaligned strd when compiling for armv5te or armv6 with gcc-7.[012].
> As someone mentioned in the bug report, that problem doesn't seem
> to happen with gcc-6 or -mtune=xscale, or with gcc-7 -march=armv7-a.
There is another solution which we've used in the past - we could detect
these compiler versions and refuse to build with the broken compilers.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists