[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <150933956733.22133.5869125353037664313.stgit@noble>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:59:27 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] staging: lustre: simplfy lov_finish_set()
When deleting everything from a list, a while loop
is cleaner than list_for_each_safe().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index 9d3b3f3e9f10..54f883e359ce 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -48,15 +48,13 @@ static void lov_init_set(struct lov_request_set *set)
static void lov_finish_set(struct lov_request_set *set)
{
- struct list_head *pos, *n;
+ struct lov_request *req;
LASSERT(set);
- list_for_each_safe(pos, n, &set->set_list) {
- struct lov_request *req = list_entry(pos,
- struct lov_request,
- rq_link);
+ while ((req = list_first_entry_or_null(&set->set_list,
+ struct lov_request,
+ rq_link)) != NULL) {
list_del_init(&req->rq_link);
-
kfree(req->rq_oi.oi_osfs);
kfree(req);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists