[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030205547.pvd23ahq7xgahlke@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:55:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
between commit:
6aa7de059173a ("locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()")
in the tip tree and some change in the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index a69a34f57330,48531da1aba6..000000000000
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@@ -1978,7 -1908,7 +1978,7 @@@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struc
if ((skb != tcp_write_queue_tail(sk)) && (limit >= skb->len))
goto send_now;
- win_divisor = ACCESS_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tso_win_divisor);
- win_divisor = READ_ONCE(sysctl_tcp_tso_win_divisor);
++ win_divisor = READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tso_win_divisor);
if (win_divisor) {
u32 chunk = min(tp->snd_wnd, tp->snd_cwnd * tp->mss_cache);
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists