linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] xen: introduce a Kconfig option to enable the pvcalls frontend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3c811da-d8ed-9a7a-5f2c-3be220e0dd70@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 18:02:32 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Cc:     xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jgross@...e.com, Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/13] xen: introduce a Kconfig option to enable the
 pvcalls frontend

On 10/30/2017 05:42 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 10/30/2017 03:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> Build warnings (gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221 (Red Hat 6.3.1-1))
>>> Hi Boris, I am trying to repro the warnings below. I have been
>>> unsuccessful so far. What system are you using? Fedora? CentOS? Do have
>>> any specific CFLAGS settings?
>>
>> I am on Fedora24, nothing interesting in my environment. For example,
>>
>> ostr@...kbase> env | grep FLAGS
>> ostr@...kbase>
>>
>> I'll send you my config file in a separate email, just in case.  Your
>> patches are on top of
>>
>>     0b07194 Linux 4.14-rc7
>>
> Thanks! I managed to repro and fix both the x86_64 and x86_32 issues.
> I sent two patches:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=150939969002183&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150939962102165
>
> But if you prefer that I spin a new pvcalls frontend series, I could
> also do that.


I haven't pushed this anywhere so I think, given that this actually
fixes a bug (when copy_to/from_iter() fails), it would be better to have
a clean series in the upstream. So I'd rather have a new spin, sorry ;-(


Thanks.
-borsi