[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171030200046.1f40a9dc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:00:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>,
Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>,
Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:41:02 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> Cool. So I think we need
>
> get_random_bytes(&ptr_key, sizeof(ptr_key));
You'll need to add a comment here to describe what ordering the memory
barrier is used against. That is, somewhere else there's something that
needs to see the "true" after the "get_random_bytes" update. Describe
it here.
-- Steve
> smp_mb();
> WRITE_ONCE(have_filled_random_ptr_key, true);
>
> V10 to include this unless I have it wrong.
>
> thanks,
> Tobin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists