[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59F832D3.5050401@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:22:43 +0800
From: Zhengqiang <zhengqiang10@...wei.com>
To: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<james.morse@....com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>, <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug fix: Clear ack of GHES table which contain wrong
Error status block, let new error can fill GHES table.
Hi, Tyler Baicar,
Sorry, i missed your patch, you already solved it. thanks.
On 2017/10/30 21:53, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> On 10/29/2017 9:23 PM, Qiang Zheng wrote:
>> Current Error status block processing flow, if wrong format is checked,
>> GHES table ack is not cleared.
>> It will cause new error can not be filled GHES table, because UEFI
>> need check ack to know if error was handled by OS.
>>
>> This patch solved issue, no matter Error status block format is wrong,
>> But GHES table format is corrected, we clear ack.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Zheng <zhengqiang10@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index 077f9ba..b0e0782 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
>> }
>> ghes_do_proc(ghes, ghes->estatus);
>> +out:
> The out goto is already at this location. Please sync to the tip:
>
> ghes_do_proc(ghes, ghes->estatus);
>
> out:
> ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
>
> if (rc == -ENOENT)
> return rc;
>
> /*
> * GHESv2 type HEST entries introduce support for error acknowledgment,
> * so only acknowledge the error if this support is present.
> */
> if (is_hest_type_generic_v2(ghes))
> return ghes_ack_error(ghes->generic_v2);
>
> return rc;
>
>
>> /*
>> * GHESv2 type HEST entries introduce support for error acknowledgment,
>> * so only acknowledge the error if this support is present.
>> @@ -752,7 +753,7 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -out:
>> +
>> ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
>> return rc;
>> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists