[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171031095517.584837254@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:55:28 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 04/23] ceph: unlock dangling spinlock in try_flush_caps()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
commit 6c2838fbdedb9b72a81c931d49e56b229b6cdbca upstream.
sparse warns:
fs/ceph/caps.c:2042:9: warning: context imbalance in 'try_flush_caps' - wrong count at exit
We need to exit this function with the lock unlocked, but a couple of
cases leave it locked.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ceph/caps.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
@@ -1900,6 +1900,7 @@ static int try_flush_caps(struct inode *
retry:
spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
if (ci->i_ceph_flags & CEPH_I_NOFLUSH) {
+ spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
dout("try_flush_caps skipping %p I_NOFLUSH set\n", inode);
goto out;
}
@@ -1917,8 +1918,10 @@ retry:
mutex_lock(&session->s_mutex);
goto retry;
}
- if (cap->session->s_state < CEPH_MDS_SESSION_OPEN)
+ if (cap->session->s_state < CEPH_MDS_SESSION_OPEN) {
+ spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
goto out;
+ }
flushing = __mark_caps_flushing(inode, session, true,
&flush_tid, &oldest_flush_tid);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists