[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lgjrd3bn.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:22:36 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
"open list\:ARM\/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: host: Don't retry NAKed transactions right away
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> writes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>>
>>>> [add Felipe since this should go through his tree]
>>>
>>> Ah. Sorry Felipe! I know you've landed some dwc2 stuff in the past
>>
>> No problems :-)
>>
>>> but for some reason get_maintainer didn't ID you so I thought maybe
>>> you weren't doing it anymore. Please let me know if you'd like me to
>>> send this to you again with collected Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags.
>>
>> Yeah, please resend with all tags collected, however let's wait for a
>> week or so and give other people time to catch up. I already sent my
>> pull request to Greg, this would, anyway, go into the -rc cycle.
>
> Doh! I just re-read this one more time (after sending v3) and
> realized I had read it incorrectly. I read it as "please send the
that's okay :-) s**t happens
> patch with the tags and I'll wait a week before landing", but you
> actually said "please wait a week before re-sending". Sorry for the
> noise. In the very least, you should be on the "To" line now so if
> anyone else has any extra tags it should be very easy for you to see
> them.
>
> Right that there's no massive urgency. It's been broken forever.
alright then :-)
>> Please add a Cc stable tag too, if necessary.
>
> Good point. It's a little weird since it doesn't "fix" any specific
> commit, so I guess it will be up to stable folks to decide how far to
> go back. The dwc2 devices I work with are actually on 3.14, but we
> have some pretty massive backports related to dwc2 there...
fair enough
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists