[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031103830.qdtudo2uwsc2ssp3@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:38:30 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: Add hardware spinlock support
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:35:55PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
This looks mostly good, a few small things:
> +static void regmap_lock_hwlock(void *__map)
> +{
> + struct regmap *map = __map;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (map->hwlock_timeout)
> + ret = hwspin_lock_timeout(map->hwlock, map->hwlock_timeout);
> + else
> + ret = hwspin_trylock(map->hwlock);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(map->dev, "Failed to get hwlock %d\n", ret);
> +}
Given that we have no error handling path on the locks should we be
supporting timeout mode at all? Otherwise we should probably add a
set of error handling paths whenever we take the lock...
> + if (config->hwlock_mode == HWLOCK_IRQSTATE) {
> + map->lock = regmap_lock_hwlock_irqsave;
> + map->unlock = regmap_unlock_hwlock_irqrestore;
> + } else if (config->hwlock_mode == HWLOCK_IRQ) {
> + map->lock = regmap_lock_hwlock_irq;
> + map->unlock = regmap_unlock_hwlock_irq;
> + } else {
> + map->lock = regmap_lock_hwlock;
> + map->unlock = regmap_unlock_hwlock;
> + }
This should be a switch statement.
> --- a/include/linux/regmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regmap.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
We don't actually use hwspinlock.h in the header (the config options are
all just unsigned ints) so this could be moved to regmap.c with a
forward declaration of the struct in internal.h. That way we don't
force a rebuild of every regmap user when hwspinlock changes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists