linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Enable SR-IOV instantiation through /sys file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:55:20 +0000
From:   "Wang, Liang-min" <liang-min.wang@...el.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        "O'riordain, Seosamh" <seosamh.oriordain@...el.com>
CC:     "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Enable SR-IOV instantiation through /sys file



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@...radead.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 8:39 AM
> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>; Duyck, Alexander H
> <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Cc: Wang, Liang-min <liang-min.wang@...el.com>;
> alex.williamson@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>; kvm@...r.kernel.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable SR-IOV instantiation through /sys file
> 
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 23:16 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:20:41PM +0000, Duyck, Alexander H wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't see this so much as a security problem per-se. It all depends
> > > on the hardware setup. If I recall correctly, there are devices where
> > > the PF function doesn't really do much other than act as a bit more
> > > heavy-weight VF, and the actual logic is handled by a firmware engine
> > > on the device.
> >
> > Can you cite an example?  While those surely could exist in theory,
> > I can't think of a practical example.
> 
> I have them, which is why I'm patching the UIO driver to allow num_vfs
> to be set. I don't even want to *use* the UIO driver for any purpose
> except to make that appear in sysfs. It's all handled in the device.
> 
> (I think we might be able to just give the PF out to a guest as if it
> were just another VF, but I don't think we actually *do* that right
> now).

Under UEFI secure boot environment, kernel puts restrictions on UIO and its derivatives.
So, user-space function/driver based upon UIO is no longer working under UEFI secure
boot environment. The next viable option is vfio-pci, hence this patch in parallel with
UIO work.