[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171031143650.GA13049@trinity.fluff.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:36:50 +0000
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C-S3C2410: Use common error handling code in
s3c24xx_i2c_probe()
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:26:20PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > @@ -1180,24 +1179,21 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > i2c->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > if (ret <= 0) {
>
> Not related to this patch, but the comparison here should be < 0. Or
> otherwise we should set an error code. The bug was introduced in commit
> e0d1ec97853f ("i2c-s3c2410: Change IRQ to be plain integer.").
>
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot find IRQ\n");
> > - clk_unprepare(i2c->clk);
> > - return ret;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
I believe (ret < 0) { } should be the correct case here.
--
Ben Dooks, ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/
Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists