[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ipSJv0PWPrD3P-yeyD0JWe6EqSJSuZXgjtnFTrMEvpfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:28:57 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its
>> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during
>> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason.
>>
>> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have
>> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime
>> suspend during system suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Is this patch independent?
It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also
depends on the PCI support for the flag.
> For my own reference:
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists