linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 12/18] sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBE_MxhuSsb=b-_jEeFybk9pfZ3HPH+AziQxkDGprKC=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:38:41 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 12/18] sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation

On 31 October 2017 at 16:01, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:14:11PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
>> > +       if (runnable_sum >= 0) {
>> > +               /*
>> > +                * Add runnable; clip at LOAD_AVG_MAX. Reflects that until
>> > +                * the CPU is saturated running == runnable.
>> > +                */
>> > +               runnable_sum += se->avg.load_sum;
>> > +               runnable_sum = min(runnable_sum, (long)LOAD_AVG_MAX);
>> > +       } else {
>> > +               /*
>> > +                * Estimate the departing task's runnable by assuming all tasks
>> > +                * are equally runnable.
>> > +                *
>> > +                * XXX: doesn't deal with multiple departures?
>>
>> Why this would not deal with multiple departures ?
>> we are using gcfs_rq->avg.load_sum that reflects the new state of the
>> gcfs_rq to evaluate the runnable_sum
>
> Ah, I figured the load_sum thing below reflected one average task worth
> of runnable.
>
>
>> > +       /* runnable_sum can't be lower than running_sum */
>> > +       running_sum = se->avg.util_sum >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; /* XXX ? */
>>
>> running_sum is scaled by cpu's capacity but not load_sum
>>
>> I have made the shortcut of using SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT for capacity
>> but we might better use arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu) instead
>
> Ah, right. We should improve the comments thereabouts, I got totally
> lost trying to track that yesterday.
>
> Also; we should look at doing that invariant patch you're still sitting
> on.

Yes. I have to rebase and test lastest changes i did